Skip to content

Civil Transactions Law · Federal Decree-Law 25 of 2025

Article 171

Section One: Sources of Obligation > Chapter One: The Contract > Part Four: Pillars, Validity, Options, and Types of a Contract

Not yet lawyer-reviewedText from the official portal, corpus snapshot of 26 October 2026.

English translation

Deliberate silence regarding a fact or circumstance constitutes deception if it is proven that the person so deceived would not have concluded the contract had they been aware of that fact or circumstance.

Official translation, as published by the portal.

Official Arabic text

يُعتبر السكوت عمدًا عن واقعة أو ملابسة تغريرًا إذا ثبت أن من غُرّر به ما كان ليبرم العقد لو علم بتلك الواقعة أو هذه الملابسة.

What it means when you sign

This article says when staying silent counts as deception. Deliberate silence about a fact or circumstance is deception if it is proven that the person deceived would not have entered the contract had they known of that fact or circumstance.

Two conditions come out of the wording: the silence must be deliberate, and it must be proven that the other side would not have contracted if they had known. The article does not say what remedy follows, and it does not say how the proof is made.

When you are about to sign, this article means that a party cannot simply keep quiet about a fact that would have changed the other side's decision, if the silence was intentional. A clause stating that the other side has made no representations, or that it relied only on the written terms, may not settle the matter where a deliberately concealed fact is shown. It is worth asking what facts matter to the decision to sign, and whether the contract records them.

In Fahm reports this article usually sits under: One-sided mechanisms

Related articles

All articles of this law