Skip to content

Evidence Law · Federal Decree-Law 35 of 2022

Article 63

Part 4: Electronic Evidence

Not yet lawyer-reviewedText from the official portal, corpus snapshot of 26 October 2026.

English translation

1. Extracts of electronic evidence shall have the probative value prescribed for the electronic evidence itself, as far as such extracts are identical to its electronic record.

2. The provision of Clause (1) of this Article shall apply to the extracts of electronic payment methods.

Official translation, as published by the portal.

Official Arabic text

.1 يكون للمستخرجات من الدليل الإلكتروني الحجية المقررة للدليل نفسه، وذلك بالقدر الذي تكون فيه المستخرجات مطابقة لسجلها الإلكتروني.

.2 يسري حكم البند (1) من هذه المادة على المستخرجات من وسائل الدفع الإلكترونية.

What it means when you sign

This article deals with extracts taken from electronic evidence. An extract has the same probative value as the electronic evidence itself, as far as the extract is identical to its electronic record. The same rule applies to extracts from electronic payment methods.

The condition is that the extract matches the electronic record it was taken from. The article gives an extract the weight of the original only to that extent. It does not say what happens when the extract differs from the record.

When you are about to sign a contract, this article means a printout, copy or statement taken from an electronic record, for example an extract from an electronic payment, can be given the same weight as the record itself if it matches that record. A clause that treats an electronic statement of account, a payment record or a system log as conclusive between the parties is connected to this article. A party that relies on an extract may need it to be identical to the underlying record, and a clause that gives one side's extracts decisive effect may deserve a closer look.

In Fahm reports this article usually sits under: One-sided mechanisms

Related articles

All articles of this law