Evidence Law · Federal Decree-Law 35 of 2022
Article 58
Part 4: Electronic Evidence
English translation
The litigant who alleges the invalidity of the electronic evidence set out in Articles (56) and
(57) of the present Law shall bear the burden of proving his allegation.
Official translation, as published by the portal.
Official Arabic text
على الخصم الذي يدعي عدم صحة الدليل الإلكتروني المنصوص عليه في المادتين (56) و(57) من هذا القانون عبء إثبات ادعائه.
What it means when you sign
This article deals with who has to prove what when electronic evidence is challenged in court. A party who claims that electronic evidence of the kinds covered by the two earlier provisions on electronic evidence is not valid carries the burden of proving that claim.
The article does not say how the proof is made or what counts as enough. It only places the burden on the party who makes the challenge, rather than on the party who relies on the electronic record.
When you are about to sign a contract, this article means that if the contract is signed, exchanged or recorded electronically, a party who later says the electronic record is not valid must be the one to prove it. A clause that sets out how notices, messages or approvals are sent and stored electronically may therefore be relevant if a dispute arises. This article does not itself make any electronic record valid. It deals only with who must prove the allegation when its validity is challenged.
Not yet cited in a Fahm report; shown because it sits in the same chapter as one that is.
Related articles
- Article 59Cited in Fahm reportsThis article gives electronic evidence a stated weight in court.
- Article 60This article says how electronic evidence is presented in court.
- Article 62This article covers the case where nobody can verify whether a piece of electronic evidence is valid, and the reason is not attributable to the parties in the case.
- Article 63Cited in Fahm reportsThis article deals with extracts taken from electronic evidence.
- Article 64This article fills a gap in the rules on electronic evidence.