Skip to content

Evidence Law · Federal Decree-Law 35 of 2022

Article 58

Part 4: Electronic Evidence

Not yet lawyer-reviewedText from the official portal, corpus snapshot of 26 October 2026.

English translation

The litigant who alleges the invalidity of the electronic evidence set out in Articles (56) and

(57) of the present Law shall bear the burden of proving his allegation.

Official translation, as published by the portal.

Official Arabic text

على الخصم الذي يدعي عدم صحة الدليل الإلكتروني المنصوص عليه في المادتين (56) و(57) من هذا القانون عبء إثبات ادعائه.

What it means when you sign

This article deals with who has to prove what when electronic evidence is challenged in court. A party who claims that electronic evidence of the kinds covered by the two earlier provisions on electronic evidence is not valid carries the burden of proving that claim.

The article does not say how the proof is made or what counts as enough. It only places the burden on the party who makes the challenge, rather than on the party who relies on the electronic record.

When you are about to sign a contract, this article means that if the contract is signed, exchanged or recorded electronically, a party who later says the electronic record is not valid must be the one to prove it. A clause that sets out how notices, messages or approvals are sent and stored electronically may therefore be relevant if a dispute arises. This article does not itself make any electronic record valid. It deals only with who must prove the allegation when its validity is challenged.

Not yet cited in a Fahm report; shown because it sits in the same chapter as one that is.

Related articles

All articles of this law