Civil Transactions Law (contracts dated before 1 June 2026) · Federal Law 5 of 1985
Article 390
Section 2: The effects of a right > Chapter Two: Means of enforcement > Part 2: Compulsory enforcement > 1- Specific Performance
This law is repealed. The article applies to contracts dated before 1 June 2026; later contracts fall under the 2025 Civil Transactions Law.
English translation
(1) The contracting parties may fix the amount of compensation in advance by making a provision therefor in the contract or in a subsequent agreement, subject to the provisions of the law.
(2) The judge may in all cases, upon the application of either of the parties, vary such agreement so as to make the compensation equal to the loss, and any agreement to the contrary shall be void.
Official translation, as published by the portal.
Official Arabic text
1 - يجوز للمتعاقدين أن يحددا مقدمًا قيمة التعويض بالنص عليها في العقد أو في اتفاق لاحق مع مراعاة أحكام القانون. 2 - ويجوز للقاضي في جميع الأحوال بناءً على طلب أحد الطرفين أن يعدل في هذا الاتفاق بما يجعل التقدير مساويًا للضرر ويقع باطلاً كل اتفاق يخالف ذلك.
What it means when you sign
This article lets the parties to a contract fix the amount of compensation in advance, either in the contract itself or in a later agreement, subject to the provisions of the law. It then gives the judge a power: in all cases, if either party asks, the judge may vary that agreement so that the compensation equals the loss actually suffered. Any agreement to the contrary is void, so the parties cannot agree that the pre-set figure is final.
When you are about to sign a contract, this article means that a clause setting a fixed sum payable on breach, such as a late-delivery charge or a cancellation penalty, is allowed in principle, but the figure is not necessarily final. Either side can ask the judge to adjust it to match the real loss, and a clause that says the figure cannot be changed is void. The clauses to look at are those on liquidated damages, penalties, delay charges and any wording that calls the amount fixed and not open to challenge.
In Fahm reports this article usually sits under: Risky commercial terms
Related articles
- Article 106Cited in Fahm reportsThis article says that a person who uses a right in an unlawful way is held liable for it.
- Article 264This article is a single short rule: what is known and accepted as the custom between merchants is treated as if it had been stated as a condition between them.
- Article 265Cited in Fahm reportsThis article sets out how a contract is interpreted.
- Article 266Cited in Fahm reportsThis article has two parts.
- Article 295This article is about how compensation for a harmful act is set.
- Article 296Cited in Fahm reportsThis article makes void any condition that aims to exempt a person from liability arising from a harmful act.