Skip to content

Civil Transactions Law (contracts dated before 1 June 2026) · Federal Law 5 of 1985

Article 106

Introductory Section: General Provisions > Chapter Five: Rights > Part 2: The abuse of rights

Not yet lawyer-reviewedText from the official portal, corpus snapshot of 26 October 2026.

This law is repealed. The article applies to contracts dated before 1 June 2026; later contracts fall under the 2025 Civil Transactions Law.

English translation

(1) A person shall be held liable for an unlawful exercise of his rights.

(2) The exercise of a right shall be unlawful: (a) if there is an intentional infringement (of another's rights); (b) if the interests which such exercise of right is designed to bring about are contrary to the rules of the Islamic Shari'ah, the law, public order, or morals; (c) if the interests desired are disproportionate to the harm that will be suffered by others; or (d) if it exceeds the bounds of usage and custom.

Official translation, as published by the portal.

Official Arabic text

1 - يجب الضمان على من استعمل حقه استعمالاً غير مشروع. 2 - ويكون استعمال الحق غيرمشروع: ( أ ) إذا توفر قصد التعدي. (ب) إذا كانت المصالح التي أُريد تحقيقها من هذا الاستعمال مخالفة لأحكام الشريعة الإسلامية أو القانون أو النظام العام أو الآداب. (ج) إذا كانت المصالح المرجوة لا تتناسب مع ما يصيب الآخرين من ضرر. (د) إذا تجاوز ما جرى عليه العرف والعادة.

What it means when you sign

This article says that a person who uses a right in an unlawful way is held liable for it. It then lists when the use of a right is unlawful: where there is an intention to infringe on someone else; where the interests sought are contrary to the rules of the Islamic Shari'ah, the law, public order or morals; where the interests sought are out of proportion to the harm others will suffer; and where the use goes beyond the bounds of usage and custom.

When you are about to sign a contract, this article means that having a right in the contract does not settle how it can be used. A clause that lets one party exercise a right, such as to terminate, to charge, to withhold or to enforce, may run into this article if using it would be aimed at harming the other side, would cause harm far greater than the benefit gained, or would go beyond what is usual in dealings of that kind. Clauses giving one party wide discretion are the ones to read with these four tests in mind.

In Fahm reports this article usually sits under: One-sided mechanisms

Related articles

All articles of this law